BIOL 102 ERAU Genetically Modified Organisms GMO

BIOL 102 ERAU Genetically Modified Organisms GMO.

My BIRW project will be about GMO’s or genetically modified
organisms. Because that is such a broad topic, this project will be
narrowed down to concentrating on genetically engineered crops and plant
food that humans consume.
I would like to discuss the following topics and questions:

Explain how GMOs are created.
What is the purpose of genetically engineering crops and what are the benefits?
Are foods that contain GMOs safe for human consumption?
Are there any regulations on genetically modified crops?
What is the future of genetically engineering food crops? The following are the instructions: Review the draft rubric before you start preparing your deliverable. Remember, your deliverable format is your choice, as identified in your proposal. You could opt for a word processed document, an MP4 file, a YouTube video, etc. You will need to share your actual project with your instructor. If your deliverable identified in your proposal was a video, your draft submission should be a video. Regardless of your format, your draft must include the following components:
Project Timeline: Identify the milestones from your proposal (edits are acceptable), clearly indicating which have been accomplished and when. Also, indicate the anticipated completion date of remaining project milestones.
Key Vocabulary: At least 10 relevant vocabulary words with definitions in your own words.
Module Connection: A description of meaningful connections between your project and thetextbook content, module objectives, and/or course learning outcomes. Simply listing objectives andoutcomes is not sufficient.
Real World Connection: A description of the meaningful connections between your project and your academic/professional career and/or personal life.
References: Formatted consistently in the same style, such as APA.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

This project will assess your critical thinking, scientific literacy, and information literacy. In the execution and presentation of your project, you are expected to:

Properly research your topic, evaluating sources for credibility and bias before using them to support your position.
Develop a clear position (ALL projects can take a position – reach out to your instructor if you get stuck here).
Integrate evidence from various sources to form a scientific argument.
Bridge information from the theoretical to the real world (module to your project and project to your personal/academic/professional life).
The grading rubic is as follows:

BIOL 120 M8 BIRW Rubric

BIOL 120 M8 BIRW Rubric

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Project Completed

Project Execution

10.0 pts

Proficient

Your work clearly indicates you completed the activity for this project and have entered the polishing phase of the project.

6.0 pts

Satisfactory

Your work indicates that you have made significant progress on your project but have not yet completed your project.

4.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your work indicates you have a solid plan for executing your project but have not yet started the activity.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

It is unclear that you have performed any work beyond background research on the topic.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Project Presentation

Project Execution

20.0 pts

Proficient

Your work presents a well-executed deliverable (text, video, etc.) as appropriate for your chosen activity. For text submissions, your work contained strong spelling and grammar, paragraph structure, and formatting. For non-text submissions, your work was polished and professional.

10.0 pts

Satisfactory

Your work presents your chosen deliverable. While it needs work, it shows good faith effort. You made an attempt to organize, edit, and format your work for clarity and flow.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your work presents your chosen deliverable. Your work does not indicate good faith effort to meet the course expectations.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

The actual deliverable is not presented.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critical Thinking

Project Execution

10.0 pts

Proficient

You actively sought out new perspectives or raised big and potentially controversial questions. Flexibility of your position is demonstrated as you explored new evidence. It is clear that you are comfortable making decisions based on scientific information, making you a responsible citizen and an educated consumer.

6.0 pts

Satisfactory

You explored new directions or perspectives. You clearly respect the complexities of the issue(s). You demonstrated critical thinking.

4.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your approach recognized alternate perspectives but did not expand your intellectual boundaries. You did not consistently demonstrate critical thinking habits of mind.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Your approach dismissed or ignored alternate perspectives, demonstrating closed habits of mind. Your position is unclear or too simplistic.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Evidence & Argument

Project Execution

10.0 pts

Proficient

You interpreted information from multiple credible sources to develop a comprehensive analysis of the evidence to support your position. You systematically and methodically analyzed assumptions (your own and others’).

6.0 pts

Satisfactory

You interpreted information from credible sources to develop a coherent analysis of the evidence to support your position. You acknowledged assumptions made in your argument (or the arguments of others).

4.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your position could be improved through stronger synthesis and evaluation of the information.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Information is taken from sources without interpretation or evaluation, resulting in a weak argument without supporting evidence.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Project Timeline

Project Execution

5.0 pts

Proficient

You identified all appropriate milestones for your project, clearly identifying which have been accomplished and the anticipated completion date of those remaining.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

You identified appropriate milestones for your project. Your timeline would benefit from clearly identifying your progress on the project.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your timeline identifies several key milestones. The progress on your timeline could be improved through a more detailed listing of milestones and/or dates.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

You did not include a timeline on your draft.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Key Vocabulary

Course Connection

5.0 pts

Proficient

You listed at least 10 relevant vocabulary terms with accurate definitions in your own words.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

You listed at least 7 vocabulary terms with accurate definitions either in your own words or properly cited.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Some of your vocabulary terms could be improved by stronger definitions OR some of your vocabulary terms are not relevant to chemistry.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

You did not include vocabulary terms and definitions.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Module Connection

Course Connection

20.0 pts

Proficient

You used information from the textbook to comprehensively describe connections between your project and module learning objectives and/or course learning outcomes. You provided page numbers, URLs, images, etc. as appropriate. A strong understanding of the material is evident through synthesis and evaluation of the content.

12.0 pts

Satisfactory

Most of your connections are appropriate, but some are missing, weak (poorly supported), or inaccurate. You provided page numbers, URLs, images, etc. as appropriate. Your understanding of the material is evident through application and analysis of the content.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your comprehension of module connections is flawed or superficial. To improve, first consider which course modules might relate to your project, then explore each module learning objective to identify which best relate. Modules 1 and 2 are gold mines for most projects!

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

You did not draw any clear connections between module content and your project. A simple listing of book sections or module learning objectives does not reach the level of drawing connections.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Real World Connection

10.0 pts

Proficient

You articulated clear connections between your project and your academic career, your professional career, and/or your personal life. It is clear that you appreciate the socially, ethically, and environmentally responsible use of chemical knowledge.

6.0 pts

Satisfactory

You identified one or more connection between the content and your professional or personal experiences.

4.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Perfunctory connections between the your project and the real world can be found in your submission but your work could be improved by making connections explicitly clear or digging deeper.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

You did not draw any clear connections between your project and the real world.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Access and Use of Information

Information Literacy

5.0 pts

Proficient

You correctly paraphrased from your sources, providing citations where appropriate. You used information in a way that was true to the original context (i.e. you did not misrepresent your sources). You appropriately distinguished between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution. You demonstrated ethical and legal use of information.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

You paraphrased from your source, providing citations where appropriate. You used information in a way that was true to the original context (i.e. you did not misrepresent your sources). You demonstrated ethical and legal use of information.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Your use of paraphrasing was mostly appropriate and true to the original context. Your errors were not intentionally unethical or illegal uses of information.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

Your access and use of information needs to be addressed to avoid illegal and unethical use of information. Your errors were likely unintentional. (Any intentional lapses in ethics will trigger Academic Integrity procedures through the University.)

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Refrences

Information Literacy

5.0 pts

Proficient

You provided in-text citations that clearly indicated how source information was used in your posts. You provided in-text citations and a works cited in a consistent citation style (APA recommended)

3.0 pts

Satisfactory

You provided in-text citations at appropriate locations and cited all sources in the references list. References mostly conformed to chosen styl.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Incomplete or erroneous citations were used in your work.

0.0 pts

Unacceptable

No sources are cited.

5.0 pts

100.0

The post BIOL 102 ERAU Genetically Modified Organisms GMO appeared first on Submit Your Homeworks.
BIOL 102 ERAU Genetically Modified Organisms GMO was first posted on February 25, 2021 at 5:50 pm.©2019 “Submit Your Assignment”. Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at ukbestwriting@gmail.com

BIOL 102 ERAU Genetically Modified Organisms GMO